![]() But that in itself is a good thing because you should never have to relearn how to use an updated camera model. ![]() I spent a month shooting with the Sony A7R IV to see how it compared to the A7R III, and when I first opened the box, I was greeted by a camera that looked, well, almost identical to its predecessor. And in true British summer fashion, it was as challenging as you’re probably thinking right now. ![]() This was going to make testing the A7R IV a serious challenge, but with trips to North Devon, Norfolk and the Peak District planned, the landscape was varied enough so the weather, as always, would be the deciding factor in the success of the images I’d be able to take. With the memories of lockdown still fading, photography trips aren’t as numerous for me as they were up to March. And most importantly, whether my decision not to upgrade was the right one. So, when I had the opportunity to try out the A7R IV for my landscape photography I was interested to see how much better, or not, the camera actually is. I moved to Sony just over two years ago and have been happy with the change the image quality of the A7R III is great, features are 85% of the way there and despite an unintuitive and frankly awkward menu system, there are an incredible number of controls and functions within for photographers and videographers to customise the camera to their near-exact requirements. Looking towards Lundy Island at sunset on the North Devon coast Sony A7R IV, FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM at 16mm, 3.2sec at f/13, ISO 100
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |